Legal Opinion

(PC) Bailey v. Cox

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 19, 2023No. 1:22-cv-00757Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY BAILEY, No. 1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS BE GRANTED, AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND BE 14 T. COX, et al., DENIED 15 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 36, ) 16 17 Plaintiff Timothy Bailey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 19

403 U.S. 388

(1971). 20 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API