Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Justice Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1974No. Sac. 7995PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, Acting C. J.

We are confronted here with the question whether the current practice of allowing non-attorney judges to preside over criminal trials of offenses punishable by a jail sentence, as is the situation in over 60 percent of the justice courts in California, violates the constitutional rights of the defendants in those proceedings. We have decided that this practice does violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and that henceforth defendants in such courts are entitled to have an attorney judge preside over all criminal…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ex Parte RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Safer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. March Fong Eu v. ChaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API