Gordon v. Justice Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, Acting C. J.
We are confronted here with the question whether the current practice of allowing non-attorney judges to preside over criminal trials of offenses punishable by a jail sentence, as is the situation in over 60 percent of the justice courts in California, violates the constitutional rights of the defendants in those proceedings. We have decided that this practice does violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and that henceforth defendants in such courts are entitled to have an attorney judge preside over all criminal…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Ex Parte RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Safer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- March Fong Eu v. ChaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.