Black v. Black
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing, on bill, answer and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
The Vice-Chancellor.
This is a suit by a wife against her husband, to establish certain property rights. It is purely a property suit. She asks neither an absolute nor limited divorce, nor that her right to be supported shall be assured to her by the decree of this court; but simply that her legal right to certain chattels and debts, and her equitable right to be compensated for the loss of certain rights and privileges belonging to her as a wife, and of which she has been'wrongfully deprived, shall be vindicated and enforced. She grounds her action on four distinct claims : First, for money…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Edelen v. EdelenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lehmann v. LehmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Gimbel v. VeninoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- Pieretti v. SeiglingNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Hill v. HillNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- McKee v. McKeeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.