Legal Opinion

Black v. Black

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1878PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On final hearing, on bill, answer and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor.

This is a suit by a wife against her husband, to establish certain property rights. It is purely a property suit. She asks neither an absolute nor limited divorce, nor that her right to be supported shall be assured to her by the decree of this court; but simply that her legal right to certain chattels and debts, and her equitable right to be compensated for the loss of certain rights and privileges belonging to her as a wife, and of which she has been'wrongfully deprived, shall be vindicated and enforced. She grounds her action on four distinct claims : First, for money…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Edelen v. EdelenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. LehmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. Gimbel v. VeninoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  3. Pieretti v. SeiglingNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  4. Hill v. HillNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  5. McKee v. McKeeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API