Legal Opinion

Pieretti v. Seigling

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 28, 1943No. Docket 139/617PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant and the defendant, who were wife and husband, became seized, as tenants by the entirety, of a house and lot in Lyndhurst in 1927, and there they made their home until 1941, when they established separate residences and rented the property. Late that year, complainant obtained a divorce from defendant.

A master has reported an account between the parties and the case is before me on the defendant's exceptions. The purchase price of the property was $2,800, none of which was paid by the defendant. Complainant paid $1,000 out of her separate estate at the time of the conveyance…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stickney v. StickneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Neubeck v. NeubeckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  3. Nobile v. BartlettaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  4. O'Connell v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  5. Adoue v. SpencerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lohmann v. LohmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Ross v. RossNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Montsinger v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Trotta v. TrottaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  5. Baird v. BairdMontana Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API