Legal Opinion

McKee v. McKee

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 12, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I am convinced that the defendant has not willfully, continuedly and obstinately deserted the petitioner for the term of two years within the purview of the Divorce act, and because thereof I will advise a decree dismissing the petitioner's petition. The petitioner and defendant were married January 26th, 1902, and lived together as husband and wife for a period of more than twenty-two years. Two children were born of the marriage — Margaret Hopper McKee, a daughter, now upwards of twenty-one years of age, and William Noyes McKee, a son, now upwards of nineteen years of age. The petitioner is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pinkinson v. PinkinsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  2. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  3. Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  4. von Bernuth v. von BernuthNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
  5. Black v. BlackNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1878

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Locher v. LocherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  2. Reynolds v. ReynoldsMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Rushmore v. RushmoreNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  4. Fleck v. FleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Reynolds v. ReynoldsMontana Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API