Schaum & Uhlinger, Inc. v. Copley-Plaza Operating Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
In Equity. Suit by Schaum & Uhlinger, Incorporated, against the Copley-Plaza Operating Company. On motion to dismiss bill.
1Opinion of the Court
DODGE, Circuit Judge.
None of the defects claimed to exist in this bill for infringement of a patent seem to me jurisdictional in the sense contended for by the defendant. If they exist, I cannot regard them as requiring dismissal of the bill without leave to amend, in view of equity rule 19 (198 Fed. xxiii, 115 C. C. A. xxiii).
[1] To show itself the owner of a monopoly granted by public authority, the plaintiff has alleged only that one Uebersax, “being, within the meaning of the statutes of the United States then in force, the inventor of a certain new and useful process,” duly filed an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCoy v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Bayley & Sons, Inc. v. Braunstein Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Maxwell Steel Vault Co. v. National Casket Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1913
- American Graphophone Co. v. National Phonograph Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904
- Zenith Carbureter Co. v. Stromberg Motor Devices Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Davis v. Motive Parts Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- Jost v. Borden Stove Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1920
- Aluminum Die-Casting Corp. v. Allied Die-Casting Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1924
- Moeller v. Scranton Glass Instrument Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.