Legal Opinion

Davis v. Motive Parts Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 23, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, District Judge.

The Heil Company is a Wisconsin corporation, and has its principal office and place of business in Milwaukee. In New York City, Motive Parts Corporation, of which the individual defendants are the directing heads, solicits orders for machines and devices manufactured by the Heil Company. In so doing, it holds itself out as the Eastern distributor of the Wisconsin concern. Eor such services as are performed in their behalf, the Heil Company pays a commission on sales, but makes no payment, as such, towards the expenses or disbursements of Motive Parts Corporation, its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Chipman, Ltd. v. Thomas B. Jeffery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Cazier v. Mackie-Lovejoy Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
  5. Bayley & Sons, Inc. v. Braunstein Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. International Plastic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
  2. Elevator Supplies Co. v. Wagner Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  3. Candas v. AgniniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  4. Aluminum Die-Casting Corp. v. Allied Die-Casting Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1924
  5. American Sales Book Co. v. Atlantic Register Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API