Legal Opinion

Maxwell Steel Vault Co. v. National Casket Co.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided May 17, 1913PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Maxwell Steel Vault Company against the National Casket Company. On motion to dismiss under new equity-rule 29 (198 Fed. xxvi, 115 C. C. A. xxvi), and also to strike out_ alleged impertinent and redundant matter.

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, District Judge.

The complainant sues to restrain alleged infringement of three several United States letters patent, the improvements described being capable of conjoint use, viz., United States letters patent No. 759,727, granted May 10, 1904, No. 759,728, granted May 10, 1904, and No. 800,930, granted October 3, 1905, all to John Maxwell. Nos. 759,728 and 800,930 are for improvements in sheet metal caskets and No. 759,727 is for fastener for sheet metal caskets.

[1] Claim 1 of No. 759,727 reads as follows:

“1. A clamping device comprising a Dase-plate, a link hinged to the base-plate and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. First Nat. Bank v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Read & Traversy v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Blessing v. Works.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
  5. Caywood v. FarrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. National Carloading Corp.United States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Universal Oil Products Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1926
  4. Bayley & Sons, Inc. v. Braunstein Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
  5. Bonney Supply Co. v. HeltzelDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API