Legal Opinion

Croke v. Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 6, 1922No. 9858PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action to quiet title to water right. Judgment for defendants. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Julian H. Moore, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff in error was plaintiff, defendant in error, The *515Farmers High Line Canal and Reservoir Company, was defendant, and the other defendants in error were interveners in the trial court, and they are hereinafter so referred to.

Plaintiff owned a water right of seventy-five statutory inches in a certain irrigation canal which was purchased by defendant upon its organization. This water, and the land to which it was appurtenant, he conveyed by three successive deeds of trust. The last of these was foreclosed, the property passed through numerous hands and finally returned to him, and he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bijou Irrigation District v. Weldon Valley Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  2. Andrews v. National Foundry & Pipe Works, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  3. Townsend v. Fulton Irrigating Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  4. Wheeler, Osgood & Co. v. LagerWashington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Newby v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. A., T. S. F. Ry. Co. v. Com'rsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  3. James v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Fort v. BietschSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  5. State Ex Rel. Mungas v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API