Legal Opinion

Sakorraphos v. Eastman Kodak Stores, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1962No. Docket 103, Calendar 48,601PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

In the trial of this case, the jury was instructed that there was a city ordinance which required drivers of vehicles turning right on a green traffic signal to yield the right-of-way to pedestrians-lawfully in a crosswalk and that violation of the-ordinance is evidence of negligence, but not negligence per se. The circuit judge did not instruct the-jury that there was a comparable statute (CLS 1956,. § 257.612 [Stat Ann 1960 Rev § 9.2312]), violation of which would be negligence per se. Following denial of his motion for new trial, after jury verdict for defendant, plaintiff appeals,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Huffman v. First Baptist Church of FlushingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Martiniano v. BoothMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hicks v. B & B DISTRIBUTORS, INC.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. DegraffenreidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Reetz v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Jaworski v. Great Scott Supermarkets, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Browne v. Fenestra, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Gallagher v. ParshallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API