Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. Parshall

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1980No. Docket 78-5418PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In the court below, the trial judge directed a verdict in favor of defendants and against plaintiff wife on her claim for loss of consortium, and directed a second verdict in favor of defendants and against plaintiff husband on the issue of causation as between defendants’ negligence and plaintiff husband’s hydrocephalic condition. The jury then returned a verdict of no cause of action on plaintiff husband’s claim of serious impairment of bodily function under the no-fault act. Judgment was entered on the verdicts, from which plaintiffs take this appeal as of right.

Plaintiffs initially…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dudek v. PoppMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ford v. Clark Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Wynn v. ColeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Howard v. City of MelvindaleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Ringo v. RichardsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Keefer v. C R Bard, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Pelley v. Peterbilt Motors Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Ethridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API