In Re Mark Industries
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
MARK INDUSTRIES, (MARK) petitions for a writ of mandamus ordering the United States District Court, Central District of California to vacate its “Order on Motion to Dismiss”, (Order) insofar as it: (1) voided the presumption of validity attached to Reissue Patent No. 31,400 (’400 patent); and (2) set the date for accrual of damages as the issue date of the ’400 patent. We grant the petition and require that the Order be vacated. 1
Background,
On October 23, 1980, MARK sued Cala-var Corporation (Calavar), (Civil Action No. CV-80-4707 AWT), alleging infringement of U.S.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Rotec Industries, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corporation, Tucker Associates, Inc. And Garry Tucker, and Mitsubishi International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- In Re Innotron DiagnosticsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- David D. Stark, M.D. v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc., Jerome Goldstein, Ernest v. Groman, and Lee JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Magnivision, Inc. v. The Bonneau CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.