Legal Opinion
Magnivision, Inc. v. The Bonneau Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 8, 1997No. 95-1093PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Magnivision, Inc. is the owner of United States Patent No. 5,144,345 for a display system for eyeglasses. The patented system is particularly useful for the display of nonprescription, corrective eyeglasses, since the customer must often try many different pairs in order to find the pair that provides optimum visual correction. The United States District Court for the Central District of California entered judgment in favor of The Bonneau Company, on a jury verdict that the ’345 patent was invalid and not infringed. 1 We conclude that the incorrect jury…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Medrad, Inc. v. Mri Devices Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Norian Corporation v. Stryker Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Jack T. Hupp and Walkmaker, Inc. v. Siroflex of America, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.