Legal Opinion
Rotec Industries, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corporation, Tucker Associates, Inc. And Garry Tucker, and Mitsubishi International Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 13, 2000No. 99-1275PublishedCited by 143 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA. Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge PAULINE NEWMAN.
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
DECISION
Rotee Industries, Inc. (“Rotee”) appeals the December 14, 1998 order of the United States District Court for Central District of Illinois granting summary judgment to Mitsubishi Corporation, Tucker Associates, Inc., Garry Tucker and Mitsubishi International Corporation on Rotec’s claims of infringement of United States Patent No. 4,170,291 (the “ ’291 patent”). See Rotec Indus., Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corp., 36 F.Supp.2d 810 (C.D.Ill.1998).…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Toibb v. RadloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Ntp, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Merial Ltd. v. Cipla Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Benitec Australia, Ltd. v. Nucleonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Litecubes, LLC v. Northern Light Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Maersk Contractors USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.