Legal Opinion

Public Employees' Benefits Program v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2008No. 50281PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J.:

This appeal raises important questions of statutory interpretation, with potentially far-reaching consequences, regarding local government employers’ obligation to subsidize the health insurance premiums of their retirees who choose to participate in the State Public Employees’ Benefits Program (PEBP). Local government employees may elect to join PEBP upon retirement if the health benefits they obtained during employment fall within a statutorily described health care program. If an employee who was covered by one of those statutory health care programs joins…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel v. WheelerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1814

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Miller v. BurkNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Sandpointe Apartments, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Sonia F. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. MGM Mirage v. Nevada Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  5. St. James Village, Inc. v. CunninghamNevada Supreme Court · 2009

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API