Legal Opinion

St. James Village, Inc. v. Cunningham

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2009No. 49398PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, C.J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether the servient estate owner has any authority to unilaterally relocate an easement burdening its property, provided that the relocation does not materially inconvenience the dominant estate owner.

To facilitate the development of its property into a planned community, appellant St. James Village, Inc., asked the dominant estate owners if St. James Village could relocate an easement that traversed across a portion of its property. The dominant estate owners refused to consent to the relocation. Accordingly, appellant filed a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lewis v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. M.P.M. Builders, LLC v. DwyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Public Employees' Benefits Program v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hotel Riviera, Inc. v. TorresNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Roaring Fork Club, L.P. v. St. Jude's Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Primadonna Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Armenta-Carpio v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Dictor v. Creative Management Services, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  4. American Sterling Bank v. Johnny Management LV, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Argentena Consolidated Mining Co. v. StandishNevada Supreme Court · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API