Legal Opinion
Pitts v. Larson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 26, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Carol Pitts, an employee of the South Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service (SDSU CES) and a member of the South Dakota House of Representatives seeks a Writ of Mandamus compelling Vernon Larson, the State Auditor of South Dakota (Larson or State), to pay her for services rendered during her employment at SDSU. We decline to issue a Writ of Mandamus.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] On November 7, 2000, Carol Pitts was elected to the South Dakota House of Representatives from District 7, Brookings County. Pitts took the oath of office on January 9, 2001, and served as a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norbeck & Nicholson Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Baker v. AtkinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Palmer v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Norbeck & Nicholson Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doe v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- In the Matter of the Interpretation of South Dakota Constitution and State Law Re: State Legislator's Interest in State or County ContractsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Olson-Roti v. KilcoinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Olson-Roti v. KilcoinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Pitts v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.