Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Olson-Roti v. Kilcoin

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 2002No. NonePublished

1ConcurrenceGilbertson, Chief Justice

[¶ 39.] While Olson-Roti mounts an impressive argument based on equitable public policy, this is not an equitable issue. Rather, the statutory interpretation of our punitive damage statute alone controls the resolution of this issue. In this jurisdiction, punitive damages have not been recoverable at common law, but rather, only where specifically authorized by statute. Vilhauer v. Horsemen’s Sports, Inc., 1999 SD 93, ¶¶ 19-20, 598 N.W.2d 525, 529-30; Thu v. American Family Ins. Co., 292 N.W.2d 109, 110-11 (S.D.1980). SDCL 21-3-2 states:

In any action for the breach of an obligation not…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Hofer v. LavenderTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Rowen v. Le Mars Mut. Ins. Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. Shirley v. ShirleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Evans v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API