Legal Opinion
Curry v. SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 30, 2009No. Case 06-11728PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Percy Curry, Rick Banks, III, and Marie Hillard have filed an amended complaint against their employer SBC Communications, Inc., also known as AT & T, Inc., alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, section 1981 of Title 42 of the United States Code, and the Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (ELCRA) based on disparate treatment on account of their race, retaliation, and a hostile work environment. The plaintiffs earlier filed a…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Chambers v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Marotta v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Artis v. Finishing Brands Holdings, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
- Reed v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Wright v. Autozone Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.