Legal Opinion
Chambers v. City of Detroit
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 30, 2011No. Case 09-11562PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
This employment matter comes before the Court on defendants City of Detroit, City Council, Martha Reeves, and Thomas Stephens’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 39.) Plaintiff, Ms. Carolyn Dianne Chambers (“Plaintiff’ or “Chambers”), has filed a response (Dkt. No. 41), and Defendants have filed a reply. (Dkt. No. 46.) Oral arguments were heard on March 10, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED IN…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Saab Automobile AB v. General Motors Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- Ickes v. Nexcare Health Systems, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Bauer v. County of SaginawDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Antunes v. Gerdau MacSteel, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Marshall v. Wayne, County ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.