Legal Opinion
Artis v. Finishing Brands Holdings, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided March 19, 2015No. 13-1090PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
J. DANIEL BREEN, Chief Judge.
Introduction
Before the Court is Defendant, Finishing Brands Holdings, Inc.’s (“FB”), motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 47.) Plaintiff, Louis Artis (“Artis”), filed a response to which FB replied. (D.E. 56, 84.) Plaintiff also submitted a sur-reply. (D.E. 88.) For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
Evidentiary Matters
A. Plaintiff’s Objections to Defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Material Fact
Plaintiff objects…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Okojie v. Metropolitan Nashville Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022