Legal Opinion
Bradshaw v. Township of Middletown
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 4, 2003No. Civil Action 02-5225 (MLC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COOPER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ separate motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) to dismiss plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“Amended Complaint”). Plaintiffs Wayne Bradshaw (“Bradshaw”), Steven Dollinger (“Dollinger”), Michael Rubino (“Rubino”), Gerald Weimer (“Weimer”), Christine Weimer and Nina Rubino filed the Amended Complaint asserting various causes of action against the defendants. Defendants Township of Mid-dletown (“Township”), Township of Mid-dletown Police Department (“Police Department”),…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- MFS, INC. v. DilazaroDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Myers v. County of SomersetDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- Schneck v. Saucon Valley School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Booth v. PenceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Adams v. Luzerne CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.