Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Sterling College, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 28, 2000No. 98-396PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs Betty and Jay Reynolds appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Sterling College, Inc. in them action to obtain a partial refund of tuition paid to defendant. In response to plaintiffs’ claim that defendant owed a refund under the policy in effect at the time they commenced paying tuition, the court held that defendant had validly reserved the right to modify its tuition reimbursement policy and had done so. Accordingly, it dismissed plaintiffs’ claims for breach of contract and consumer fraud. We reverse and remand.

The complaint, answer, affidavits and depositions…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brody v. Finch University of Health Sciences/the Chicago Medical SchoolAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. Gamble v. University SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. Lane v. Town of GraftonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. P.F. Jurgs & Co. v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. Merrow v. GoldbergDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Knelman v. Middlebury CollegeDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2012
  3. State v. GREAT NORTHEAST PRODUCTIONS, INC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. Mooers v. Middlebury CollegeDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2024
  5. Mooers v. Middlebury CollegeDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API