Legal Opinion
Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 15, 2007No. A113662PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAMBDEN, J.
Mohammad Kashmiri, Benson R. Cohen, Anupama K. Menon, Sally Schwettmann, John Alden, Janet Lee, Teddy Miller, and Jennifer Blake, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons (collectively, respondents), filed an action for injunctive and declaratory relief and for damages against The Regents of the University of California (the Regents or University) after the University increased various fees. The University asserts that it did not breach any contract with the students and, even if it did, this court should reduce the damages by the amount of grant…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Premier Medical Management Systems, Inc. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Williams Hicks v. Pga Tour, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Jeremy Revitch v. Directv, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Provost v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Truly Nolen of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.