People v. Glasper
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
A jury found defendants Troy Edward Morgan, Charles Edward Glasper, and Julie Ann Glasper 1 guilty of transporting cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a)]). 2 Defendants also had been charged with possession of cocaine base for sale (§ 11351.5); Troy was acquitted of this count, while Charles and Julie were found guilty of a lesser-included offense, possession of cocaine base (§ 11350). Troy and Julie were found guilty of possessing drug paraphernalia (§ 11364), and Charles and Julie were found guilty of being under the influence of a controlled substance (§…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re DeLongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. SUPERIOR COURT (TURNER)California Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. EMMALCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. SUPERIOR COURT (HENKEL)California Court of Appeal · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re OgeaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. Dove IIICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. FerrandoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Doe 1 v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- People v. Duke CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.