Legal Opinion

People v. Ferrando

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 2004No. C042104PublishedCited by 1 opinion

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

Defendant Walter Mario Ferrando appeals his conviction for opening or maintaining a place for the use or sale of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11366), 1 as well as the sentence imposed following his conviction. He contends (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the instruction and conviction on an aiding and abetting theory and (2) the court erred in refusing to sentence him under Proposition 36.

In the published portion of the opinion, we shall conclude defendant was ineligible for Proposition 36 sentencing. In the unpublished portion of the opinion,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. EsparzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People v. GlasperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API