Dunnebacke Co. v. Pittman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
Although numerous attacks are made upon the judgment herein we find it necessary to discuss but one question, since, in our view, the determination of that question must result in a reversal of the judgment and a dismissal of the cross-complaint.
Did the court err in permitting Pittman to recover from the defendants Gilligan upon quasi-contract for work performed and materials furnished by him in erecting a breakwater upon certain premises belonging to defendant Lena B. Gilligan ? .
It is necessary that the material facts be stated. The defendants Gilligan were residents of Chicago. Mrs.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Western Assurance Co. v. TowleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- County of Sheboygan v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Grossbier v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Richland County Bank v. Joint School District No. 2 of BoazWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arjay Investment Co. v. KohlmetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Buckett v. JanteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- GEBHARDT BROS., INC. v. BrimmelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Trempealeau County v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Nelson v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.