Trempealeau County v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
The clerk in collecting the fees was the agent of the state and in no sense acting for the county in the collection and handling of the fees. That appears clearly from the provisions of'pertinent statutes. There is nothing in the statutes to indicate that it was intended that the counties should participate in any of the transactions involving the issuance of the licenses or the collection and remittance of the fees collected therefor. Sec. 29.09 (2), Stats. 1947, authorizes the county clerks to issue the licenses and sub. (7) provides that,
“Of the fees paid for such licenses the county clerk…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Houston v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Holzworth v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- In re Wausau Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Sonnesyn v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Dunnebacke Co. v. PittmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Boldt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Prn Associates LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of AdministrationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Thomas E. Lister v. Patrick J. LuceyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.