Buckett v. Jante
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.
¶ 1. Daniel Buckett paid the property taxes on a portion of his neighbors' property for over twenty-five years, but neither he nor his neighbors, Glenn and Elsie Jante, knew it. It was not until the Wisconsin Department of Transportation condemned the parcel and paid the Jantes $63,000 that both parties found out. Buckett wanted to be paid back, so he sued, inter alia, for a portion of the condemnation sale price on the theory of unjust enrichment. The circuit court held that unjust enrichment was unavailable because the Jantes did not have "knowledge or appreciation" that Buckett was paying…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- S & M Rotogravure Service, Inc. v. BaerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Gouger v. HardtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Nelson v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Moulas v. PBC Productions Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Admiral Insurance v. Paper Converting Machine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- In re Dial Complete Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015
- North Highland Inc. v. Jefferson Machine & Tool Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Don-Rick, Inc. v. QBE AmericasDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- Alessi v. Bowen Court CondominiumSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.