Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Andersen v. Reward Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 24, 1992No. C3-91-2143Published
1Opinion of the Court
482 N.W.2d 815 (1992)
STATE of Minnesota, by its Lottery Director, George ANDERSEN, and its Attorney General, Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Respondent,
v.
REWARD CORPORATION, Appellant.
No. C3-91-2143.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
March 24, 1992.
Review Denied May 15, 1992.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., E. Joseph Newton, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent.
William H. Henney, Minnetonka, for appellant.
Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and RANDALL and SHORT, JJ.
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant alleges the trial court erred when it permanently enjoined appellant from using two…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- General Mills, Inc. v. Kellogg Company, Kellogg Company v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Aveda Corp. v. Evita Marketing, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Lawyers Title Ins. Co. v. Lawyers Title Ins. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Griesedieck Western Brewery Co. v. Peoples Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.