Legal Opinion

In re Chicago Rys. Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 21, 1936No. 63584Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILKERSON, District Judge.

The debtor has presented a motion requesting the court to approve the petition as properly filed and as filed in good faith. This court, on November 21, 1936, filed its findings and conclusions upon the objections to the special master’s report and the reorganization plan in Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Railways Company et al. (First National Bank of Chicago v. Chicago City Railway Company et al.), 17 F.Supp. 181.

The plan presented in the equity suit has the support of 85 per 'cent, of the bondholders and of more than two-thirds of each class of security…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tennessee Publishing Co. v. American National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Rys. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API