Legal Opinion

Crossett School District v. Gourley

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 7, 1995No. CA94-818Published

1Opinion of the Court

899 S.W.2d 482 (1995)

50 Ark.App. 1

CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Appellant,

v.

Carolyn GOURLEY, Appellee.

No. CA94-818.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, En Banc.

June 7, 1995.

Nathan C. Culp, Little Rock, for appellant.

Gary M. Draper, Crossett, for appellee.

COOPER, Judge.

The appellant appeals from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission finding the appellee's sinus difficulties a compensable occupational disease. On appeal, the appellant argues that the Commission erred in finding that the appellee proved by clear and convincing evidence that she suffered an occupational disease as…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Crossett School District v. GourleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Sanyo Manufacturing Corp. v. LeisureCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Willmon v. Allen Canning Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Grimes v. North American FoundryCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API