Legal Opinion

In Re Monaco

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1993No. SC S36807PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this case is whether Joseph E. Monaco (Applicant) has established that he has the requisite good moral character for admission to practice law in this state. We find that he has not and, therefore, do not admit Applicant to practice law in the State of Oregon.

On January 5, 1990, the Board of Bar Examiners (Board) filed an opinion and recommendation with this court that the Applicant not be admitted to practice law in Oregon. On February 20,1990, Applicant filed a Petition for Review of the Board’s recommendation. On February 27, 1990, the court referred the matter to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re JaffeeOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re CovingtonOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re Admission to the Bar of the State of Oregon, CarterOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re BernathOregon Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API