Legal Opinion
Lanstrum v. Zumwalt
Montana Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1925No. 5,690PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.
Tbe plaintiffs constituted the state highway commission of Montana, which had general control over the construction of roads and the primary control over the fund known as the “state highway trust fund,” and on. November 17, 1921, acting through their executive committee, entered into a contract with the defendants Zumwalt and Duckers for the construction of a road in Ravalli county, known as federal aid project No. 120A, which contract, in reference to payments to be made thereunder, contains the following provisions:
“ (64) Scope of Payments. * * * No…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- First Nat. Bank of Seattle v. City Trust, Safe Deposit & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Wasco Co. v. New England Equitable Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Hipwell v. the National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gary Hay Grain Co., Inc. v. CarlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- National Surety Co. of New York v. UlmenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Riverview State Bank v. WentzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Monona County v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Ottumwa Boiler Works v. M. J. O'Meara & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.