Legal Opinion
National Surety Co. of New York v. Ulmen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1933No. 7223PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
As part of a, contract for the construction of a road for the state highway commission of the state of Montana, R. A. Schwieger, the contractor, who is not a party to this suit, made the following agreement:
“40. Bairicades, Danger, Warning and Detour Signs. The. contractor shall provide, erect and maintain all necessary barricades, suitable and sufficient red lights, warning and danger signals and signs, provide a sufficient number of watchmen and take all necessary precautions for the protection of the work and safety of the public. The Commission will provide and the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Takao Ozawa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Nalle v. OysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Fosmire v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re SINKING OFCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Tri-State Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- State Highway Administration v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Hensley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.