Legal Opinion

Riverview State Bank v. Wentz

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1929No. 8111PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff bank, herein appellant, as assignee of the Sam Ward Paving Company, a copartnership, sued the members of the Oklahoma highway commission, the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, R. L. Davis, and one Melone, as the administrator of Ward, deceased, and being east below, has brought the case here for review.

The facts are few and fairly simple: The Sam Ward Paving Company, a partnership, composed of Sam Ward (now deceased) and defendant Davis, had a contract with the Oklahoma highway commission for the construction of certain public highways in Okla*420boma.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Lacy v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States for the Benefit of KenyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  2. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of Detroit v. Federal Nat. Bank of ShawneeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  3. Martin v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  4. The Bank of Arizona, a Corporation v. National Surety Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Seaboard Surety Co. v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API