Legal Opinion

Salo v. Tyler

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2018No. Case No. 20150520PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Associate Chief Justice Lee, opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 In 2011 David Salo was fired from Amgen, Inc., where he worked as a pharmaceutical representative. Salo later filed claims for defamation and interference with economic relations, asserting that three administrators at the University of Utah Hospital pharmacy-Linda Tyler, Kavish Choudhary, and John Vu-defamed him and caused him to lose his job. The district court dismissed these claims on summary judgment. We affirm.

¶ 2 In so doing we first clarify the operative summary judgment standard under rule 56 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Eldridge v. JohndrowUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Birkner v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Colosimo v. Gateway Cmty. ChurchUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Cochegrus v. Herriman CityUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Espenschied Transp. Corp. v. Fleetwood Servs., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Rossi v. University of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Backbone Worldwide Inc. v. Lifevantage Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2019

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API