Fisher v. Harleysville Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
In this action for declaratory judgment, the trial court determined that Donald T. Fisher had been an “occupant” of a truck which had been owned by Timothy Wiker and insured by Harleysville Insurance Company (Harleysville). Therefore, the court entered summary judgment holding that Fisher was entitled to recover underinsured motorist benefits from Harleysville. Harleysville appealed. After careful review, we affirm.
On November 29, 1988, Fisher and his friend, Timothy Wiker, went deer hunting. At or about 1:00 p.m., they were driven to the hunting area in Wiker’s pickup truck by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Rybas v. WapnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Rau v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Vale Chemical Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hoffmaster v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Lucas-Raso v. American Manufacturers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Curry v. Huron InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Petika v. Transcontinental Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- BINOTTO v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.