Lee v. . Manley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Ferguson, J., at Fall Term, 1910, of HERTFORD. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice Allen.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
This is an action to recover possession of personal property, which the plaintiff claims by reason of a chattel mortgage executed to him by the defendant. The defendant, among other things, alleges in his answer: “That there is still due and owing on the mortgage described in the affidavit for the claim and delivery of personal property in this action, the sum of $6.59, and that said amount was duly tendered to plaintiff by the defendant’s attorney on 8 December, 1909, with interest on said mortgage. Said tender is hereby pleaded in bar of further recovery in this action.”
It was admitted on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bissell v. HeywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Smith v. Old Dominion Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Parker v. . BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Soper v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Young v. . AlfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ingold v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Power Co. v. . Clay CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Dr. Shoop Family Medicine Co. v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Carson v. Cook County Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Harvey v. Kinston Knitting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.