Legal Opinion

Kimball v. Loomis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1878PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, C. J.

This was a proceeding by the appellant, against the appellee, under section 99 of the code, as amended by the act of 1867, 2 R. S. 1876, p. 82, for relief *202from a judgment previously rendered, upon the ground of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect.”

The record shows that, at the September term, 1876, of the court below, the appellee recovered a judgment by default, against the appellant; that, at the next November-term ot said court, the appellant tiled his application, in the form of a complaint, to set aside said judgment, alleging that it was obtained through the “mistake,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aurora Fire Insurance v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Kesler v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. White Lick Quarterly Meeting of Friends v. White Lick Quarterly Meeting of FriendsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sidener v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Woollen v. WishmierIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Crumley v. HickmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Close v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Shields v. McMahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API