Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commercial Credit Co. v. Cummings

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 11, 1929No. 12676Published

1Dissent

This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Grimball, allowing the plaintiff to amend its summons and complaint and to enter up judgment against C.W. Cummings, under the circumstances which I shall detail.

The credit company brought suit against Cummings Motor Company and W.P. Cook upon a promissory note given by Cook to the Cummings Motor Company, secured by a chattel mortgage, and indorsed by the Cummings Motor Company to the plaintiff credit company, upon which a balance of $358.60 was claimed.

The Credit Company assumed, in error, that the payee and indorser of a note, Cummings…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. McGrath v. Piedmont Mutual Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  4. Benson v. ShinesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Nixon & Danforth v. Piedmont Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API