Legal Opinion

Henkel v. Hood

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1945No. 4834PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MABRY, Justice.

This is an appeal taken by plaintiff below from a judgment dismissing the cause of action upon the ground that the party suing was' not entitled to maintain the action.

The action was brought under 1941 Comp. § 24-101, for the alleged wrongful death of Madel T. Henkel, wife of the plaintiff. It was alleged in the complaint that the death arose through the negligence of defendants in parking a gasoline transport truck on a highway at night without setting out lighting or signal devices. The facts in the case and the character of the pleadings need not be particularly noticed. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Wells-Dickey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. In re Wilcox & Howe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  5. Wilson v. PollardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Leyba v. WhitleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hall v. StilesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Varney v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API