Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Pollard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1940No. 13183PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

In determining whether or not thp word “administrator” in the Code, § 105-1309, embraces a “temporary administrator,” it is important to consider the legislative purpose in enacting the law. No special rights are conferred upon the administrator or executor, nor is there imposed upon such administrator or executor a single duty or responsibility to be performed in a representative capacity. The sole purpose of the legislature in using the words “administrator or executor” is to designate an agency for the prosecution of the suit thereby provided for. Manifestly there is no…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Rwy. Co. v. GravittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Augusta Railway Co. v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Gazan v. HeerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky v. State Revenue CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Board of Tax-Assessors v. CatledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Eastern Air Lines Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Leyba v. WhitleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Haley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  4. Baca v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Henkel v. HoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API