Legal Opinion

Tyson v. ACRT Services Incorporated

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 5, 2024No. 4:23-cv-01889Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RYAN TYSON, Case No. 23-cv-01889-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION 9 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 ACRT SERVICES INCORPORATED, et Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 44, 67, 70, 75 al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court are Defendants’ four motions to dismiss and Plaintiff’s motion for 14 summary judgment. See Dkt. Nos. 28, 44, 67, 70, 75. The Court finds these matters appropriate 15 for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. For the reasons 16 detailed below, the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API