Legal Opinion
Carey v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 15, 2004No. 2:02-cv-01052PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARBLEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FedEx Ground”). Plaintiff, Don Carey, seeks to recover from Defen dant on theories of (1) race discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981; (2) breach of contract; (3) promissory estoppel; and (4) fraud. Plaintiffs claims are based on Defendant’s failure to provide him with a delivery route as an independent contractor. Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1367. For the following reasons,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fogg v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Proa v. NRT Mid Atlantic, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Aquino v. Honda of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Fogg v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Kriegel v. FleckDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025