Legal Opinion

Kriegel v. Fleck

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 24, 2025No. 3:23-cv-01620Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JON J. KRIEGEL, et al., CASE NO. 3:23 CV 1620 Plaintiffs, v. JUDGE JAMES R. KNEPP II BRYAN M. FLECK, et al., MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendants. ORDER INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 15). The matter is fully briefed and decisional. (Docs. 15-1, 19, 22). For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion in part and denies it in part. Specifically, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion as to Plaintiffs’ claim for breach of contract but…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mcpherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API