Legal Opinion
George G. Hardie, Kard King, Inc., and Park Place Associates, Ltd. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 10, 2004No. 04-5026, 04-5035PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Chief Judge.
The United States appeals the order of the United States Court of Federal Claims denying its motion to enjoin an arbitration proceeding addressing the contract claims of plaintiffs-appellees George G. Hardie, Kard King, Inc., and Park Place Associates, Ltd. (collectively, “PPA”), the same claims now before the Court of Federal Claims. Hardie v. United States, No. 99-890C (Fed.Cl. Nov. 14, 2003) [Hardie III]. Because we lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal, we dismiss.
Background
This is the second appeal arising from a case still before the Court of Federal Claims, Hardie v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- View Engineering, Inc. v. Robotic Vision Systems, Inc., and Morrison Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Pin/nip, Inc. v. Platte Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Thomas J. Suel and Amelia K. Suel, Parents and Next Friends of David J. Suel v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Park Place Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Rosales v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Mata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Accenture LLP v. SprengCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.