Legal Opinion
Mata v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 3, 2012No. 09-796CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WHEELER, Judge.1
In this breach of contract action, Plaintiff Florentino L. Mata alleges that the United States Department of the Army breached a Negotiated Settlement Agreement (“NSA”) between the parties. Mr. Mata seeks monetary damages for (1) lost wages, (2) back pay, front pay, and any other compensatory damages, and (3) attorney’s fees. The Government filed a motion to dismiss, alleging that this Court does not have jurisdiction to consider Mr. Mata’s claims because the settlement agreement does not mandate the payment of money damages.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pucciariello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Mata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Palafox Street Associates, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Mata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Housing Authority of the City of New Haven v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.