View Engineering, Inc. v. Robotic Vision Systems, Inc., and Morrison Law Firm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
The Morrison Law Firm, which represented Robotic Vision Systems, Inc., appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in which sanctions were ordered under Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. View Eng’g, Inc. v. Robotic Vision Sys., Inc., No. CV 95-1882 (C.D. Cal. June 26, 1996). Because the order containing the sanction was not final, and hence was not appealable, we' dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
View Engineering, Inc. filed a declaratory judgment action against Robotic, alleging that one of Robotic’s patents…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Max I. Bittner v. Sadoff & Rudoy IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Elizabeth Nye Woodard, Miles Cogley Nye, Jr., and the Kendall Company v. Sage Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Leon E. Cooper v. Salomon Brothers Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- Special Devices, Inc. v. Oea, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Pin/nip, Inc. v. Platte Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Pandrol Usa, Lp and Pandrol Limited v. Airboss Railway Products, Inc., Airboss of America Corp., Robert M. Magnuson, and Jose R. MediavillaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- View Engineering, Inc. v. Robotic Vision Systems, Inc., and Morrison Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Fieldturf, Inc. And Fieldturf International, Inc. v. Southwest Recreational Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.