Legal Opinion
Simonton v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided July 25, 1951No. A-11397PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
Frank Stanford Simonton, as defendant, was prosecuted by information filed in the municipal criminal court of the city of Tulsa, charging him with the crime of driving an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. He was tried before a jury, found guilty and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50, and confinement in the city jail for a term of 60 days. Appeal has been duly perfected to this court.
There is but one question involved, and being whether the verdict and judgment of conviction are sustained by sufficient evidence.
The charge against defendant grew out of a collision…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Luellen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Bisanar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Drew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Omalza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Ryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
- Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Baum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.